IBRD only vs Lithuania: Armed forces personnel
Armed forces personnel over time
- IBRD only
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2.5% against 0.7% in IBRD only, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.3 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 21st of 44 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.3% | IBRD only |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 1.5% | 0.7% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 2.0% | 1.2% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 2.5% | 1.7% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, IBRD only or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 2.5% against 0.7% in IBRD only as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel between IBRD only and Lithuania?
- 1.8%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Lithuania?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do IBRD only and Lithuania rank globally for armed forces personnel?
- IBRD only ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 21st of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces. Labor force comprises all people who meet the International Labour Organization's definition of the economically active population.