Low income vs Sri Lanka: Armed forces personnel
Armed forces personnel over time
- Low income
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.7% against 1.2% in Low income, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 3.1 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 9th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 46 groups.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 2.2% | 0.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1.8% | 2.7% | 0.9% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 3.1% | 1.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 3.7% | 2.5% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, Low income or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.7% against 1.2% in Low income as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel between Low income and Sri Lanka?
- 2.5%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Low income and Sri Lanka rank globally for armed forces personnel?
- Low income ranks 9th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces. Labor force comprises all people who meet the International Labour Organization's definition of the economically active population.