Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate

Early-demographic dividend
0.3732 % change on previous year
in 2020
New Zealand
11.11 % change on previous year
in 2020
Early-demographic dividend rank
9th
New Zealand rank
9th

Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • New Zealand
-2002040199020052020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 11.11 % change on previous year against 0.3732 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 10.74 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 29.8 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 43 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 4.86 % change on previous year -2.22 % change on previous year 7.08 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2000s 0.403 % change on previous year 0.2954 % change on previous year 0.1076 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2010s 0.2924 % change on previous year -0.6152 % change on previous year 0.9077 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2020s 0.3732 % change on previous year 11.11 % change on previous year 10.74 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate, Early-demographic dividend or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 11.11 % change on previous year against 0.3732 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate between Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
10.74 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do Early-demographic dividend and New Zealand rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/">Early-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,344 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Armed forces personnel, total. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.