Mongolia vs Zambia: Armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled
Mongolia
18,000
in 2020
Zambia
16,000
in 2020
Mongolia rank
110th
Zambia rank
113th
Armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled over time
- Mongolia
- Zambia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 18,000 against 16,000 in Zambia, a difference of 2,000.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 113th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 33,000 | 16,600 | 16,400 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 23,280 | 19,500 | 3,780 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 16,190 | 18,500 | 2,310 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 17,530 | 16,360 | 1,170 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 18,000 | 16,000 | 2,000 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled, Mongolia or Zambia?
- Mongolia, at 18,000 against 16,000 in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled between Mongolia and Zambia?
- 2,000, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled?
- Mongolia ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 113th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel, total with 597 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.