Eritrea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Armed forces personnel, total, per capita

Eritrea
0.0614 units per person
in 2020
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
0.0061 units per person
in 2020
Eritrea rank
1st
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
4th

Armed forces personnel, total, per capita over time

  • Eritrea
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
00.020.040.060.080.1198520022020

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.0614 units per person against 0.0061 units per person in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.0553 units per person.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 10.1 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 1st and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 4th of 173 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.035 units per person 0.0098 units per person 0.0252 units per person Eritrea
2000s 0.0761 units per person 0.0085 units per person 0.0676 units per person Eritrea
2010s 0.0652 units per person 0.0068 units per person 0.0584 units per person Eritrea
2020s 0.0614 units per person 0.0061 units per person 0.0553 units per person Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per capita, Eritrea or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
Eritrea, at 0.0614 units per person against 0.0061 units per person in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per capita between Eritrea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
0.0553 units per person, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
How do Eritrea and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per capita?
Eritrea ranks 1st and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 4th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Armed forces personnel, total, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-capita/eritrea/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-capita/eritrea/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/">Eritrea vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Armed forces personnel, total, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.