Eswatini vs Sudan: Armed forces personnel, total, per capita
Eswatini
0.0029 units per person
in 1999
Sudan
0.0031 units per person
in 2020
Eswatini rank
98th
Sudan rank
96th
Armed forces personnel, total, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0031 units per person against 0.0029 units per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 98th and Sudan ranks 96th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0048 units per person | 0.003 units per person | 0.0018 units per person | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.0031 units per person | 0.0038 units per person | 0.0007 units per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per capita, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0031 units per person against 0.0029 units per person in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per capita between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0.0002 units per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1999.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 98th and Sudan ranks 96th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.