Hungary vs South Sudan: Armed forces personnel, total, per capita
Hungary
0.0048 units per person
in 2020
South Sudan
0.005 units per person
in 2020
Hungary rank
65th
South Sudan rank
63rd
Armed forces personnel, total, per capita over time
- Hungary
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.005 units per person against 0.0048 units per person in Hungary, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 65th and South Sudan ranks 63rd of 173 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0039 units per person | 0.0175 units per person | 0.0136 units per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0048 units per person | 0.005 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per capita, Hungary or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.005 units per person against 0.0048 units per person in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per capita between Hungary and South Sudan?
- 0.0002 units per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and South Sudan rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 65th and South Sudan ranks 63rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.