Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.7784 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0727 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Belarus rank
41st
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
38th

Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
00.20.40.60.81198520022020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.7784 units per square kilometre against 0.0727 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.7057 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 10.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 41st and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 173 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4724 units per square kilometre 0.0765 units per square kilometre 0.3959 units per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.8603 units per square kilometre 0.0772 units per square kilometre 0.7831 units per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.7852 units per square kilometre 0.0831 units per square kilometre 0.7021 units per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.7784 units per square kilometre 0.0727 units per square kilometre 0.7057 units per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre, Belarus or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Belarus, at 0.7784 units per square kilometre against 0.0727 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre between Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
0.7057 units per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 41st and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,752 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.