East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Israel: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.4229 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Israel
8.23 units per square kilometre
in 2020
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
4th
Israel rank
4th

Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Israel
02468198520022020

How they compare

Israel currently reports 8.23 units per square kilometre against 0.4229 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 7.81 units per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 19.4 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Israel ranks 4th of 43 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Israel Difference Ahead
1980s 0.4458 units per square kilometre 7.69 units per square kilometre 7.25 units per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.4481 units per square kilometre 8.45 units per square kilometre 8 units per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.4608 units per square kilometre 8.26 units per square kilometre 7.8 units per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.4407 units per square kilometre 8.43 units per square kilometre 7.99 units per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.4229 units per square kilometre 8.23 units per square kilometre 7.8 units per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Israel?
Israel, at 8.23 units per square kilometre against 0.4229 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel?
7.81 units per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel?
33 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Israel ranks 4th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Israel: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/israel/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Israel: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,752 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.