Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0357 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0316 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea rank
148th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
151st

Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.020.040.060.08198520022020

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0357 units per square kilometre against 0.0316 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0041 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 173 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 0.057 units per square kilometre 0.0454 units per square kilometre 0.0117 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0464 units per square kilometre 0.0452 units per square kilometre 0.0012 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.048 units per square kilometre 0.0327 units per square kilometre 0.0153 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0457 units per square kilometre 0.0319 units per square kilometre 0.0138 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0357 units per square kilometre 0.0316 units per square kilometre 0.004 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0357 units per square kilometre against 0.0316 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0041 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,752 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.