Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre

Late-demographic dividend
0.2133 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Rwanda
1.42 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Late-demographic dividend rank
21st
Rwanda rank
20th

Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
0123198520022020

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.42 units per square kilometre against 0.2133 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 1.21 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 6.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 20th of 43 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 0.321 units per square kilometre 0.227 units per square kilometre 0.094 units per square kilometre Late-demographic dividend
1990s 0.246 units per square kilometre 1.55 units per square kilometre 1.31 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.2252 units per square kilometre 2.28 units per square kilometre 2.06 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.216 units per square kilometre 1.42 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.2133 units per square kilometre 1.42 units per square kilometre 1.21 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre, Late-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.42 units per square kilometre against 0.2133 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre between Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
1.21 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 20th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,752 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.