Least developed countries vs Trinidad and Tobago: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
0.1258 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
0.9747 units per square kilometre
in 2020
Least developed countries rank
33rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
34th

Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.511.5198520022020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.9747 units per square kilometre against 0.1258 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.8489 units per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 7.7 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 43 groups.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0797 units per square kilometre 0.3996 units per square kilometre 0.3199 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.1262 units per square kilometre 0.8889 units per square kilometre 0.7627 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.1474 units per square kilometre 0.7075 units per square kilometre 0.56 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.1505 units per square kilometre 0.8073 units per square kilometre 0.6567 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.1258 units per square kilometre 0.9747 units per square kilometre 0.8488 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.9747 units per square kilometre against 0.1258 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.8489 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Least developed countries and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Trinidad and Tobago: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/armed-forces-personnel-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/trinidad-and-tobago/">Least developed countries vs Trinidad and Tobago: Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 6,752 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.