Afghanistan vs Philippines: Armed forces personnel, total
Afghanistan
165,000
in 2020
Philippines
157,000
in 2020
Afghanistan rank
37th
Philippines rank
40th
Armed forces personnel, total over time
- Afghanistan
- Philippines
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 165,000 against 157,000 in Philippines, a difference of 8,000.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Philippines ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 40th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 51,000 | 113,400 | 62,400 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 227,900 | 129,880 | 98,020 | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 128,416 | 149,778 | 21,362 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 314,105 | 161,985 | 152,120 | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 165,000 | 157,000 | 8,000 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Afghanistan or Philippines?
- Afghanistan, at 165,000 against 157,000 in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Afghanistan and Philippines?
- 8,000, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Afghanistan and Philippines rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
- Afghanistan ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 40th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.