Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Armed forces personnel, total

Antigua and Barbuda
0
in 2020
Libya
0
in 2020
Antigua and Barbuda rank
169th
Libya rank
169th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Libya
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k198520022020

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Libya ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Libya ranks 169th of 173 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Libya Difference Ahead
1980s 100 73,000 72,900 Libya
1990s 180 68,500 68,320 Libya
2000s 183.33 76,222 76,039 Libya
2010s 180 4,667 4,487 Libya
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Antigua and Barbuda or Libya?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
19 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Libya rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Libya ranks 169th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.