Australia vs Singapore: Armed forces personnel, total

Australia
60,000
in 2020
Singapore
59,000
in 2020
Australia rank
64th
Singapore rank
65th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Australia
  • Singapore
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198520022020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 60,000 against 59,000 in Singapore, a difference of 1,000.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 64th and Singapore ranks 65th of 173 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 70,200 55,500 14,700 Australia
1990s 62,590 95,050 32,460 Singapore
2000s 53,035 162,910 109,875 Singapore
2010s 57,400 123,210 65,810 Singapore
2020s 60,000 59,000 1,000 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Australia or Singapore?
Australia, at 60,000 against 59,000 in Singapore as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Australia and Singapore?
1,000, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Singapore?
33 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Australia and Singapore rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Australia ranks 64th and Singapore ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.