Brazil vs Iran: Armed forces personnel, total

Brazil
762,000
in 2020
Iran
650,000
in 2020
Brazil rank
8th
Iran rank
10th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Brazil
  • Iran
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k198520022020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 762,000 against 650,000 in Iran, a difference of 112,000.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Iran's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Iran ahead.

Brazil ranks 8th and Iran ranks 10th of 173 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Iran in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iran Difference Ahead
1980s 297,500 607,000 309,500 Iran
1990s 491,495 658,860 167,365 Iran
2000s 696,228 576,500 119,728 Brazil
2010s 729,592 580,400 149,192 Brazil
2020s 762,000 650,000 112,000 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Brazil or Iran?
Brazil, at 762,000 against 650,000 in Iran as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Brazil and Iran?
112,000, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iran?
33 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Iran rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Brazil ranks 8th and Iran ranks 10th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.