Ethiopia vs Malaysia: Armed forces personnel, total

Ethiopia
138,000
in 2020
Malaysia
136,000
in 2020
Ethiopia rank
44th
Malaysia rank
45th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Malaysia
100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k350.0k198520022020

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 138,000 against 136,000 in Malaysia, a difference of 2,000.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 44th and Malaysia ranks 45th of 173 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Malaysia Difference Ahead
1980s 233,500 112,500 121,000 Ethiopia
1990s 153,550 128,340 25,210 Ethiopia
2000s 199,878 127,500 72,378 Ethiopia
2010s 138,000 134,320 3,680 Ethiopia
2020s 138,000 136,000 2,000 Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Ethiopia or Malaysia?
Ethiopia, at 138,000 against 136,000 in Malaysia as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Ethiopia and Malaysia?
2,000, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malaysia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Ethiopia and Malaysia rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Ethiopia ranks 44th and Malaysia ranks 45th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.