Malaysia vs Sudan: Armed forces personnel, total

Malaysia
136,000
in 2020
Sudan
144,000
in 2020
Malaysia rank
45th
Sudan rank
43rd

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Malaysia
  • Sudan
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k198520022020

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 144,000 against 136,000 in Malaysia, a difference of 8,000.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 43rd of 173 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Sudan Difference Ahead
1980s 112,500 60,800 51,700 Malaysia
1990s 128,340 92,760 35,580 Malaysia
2000s 127,500 122,978 4,522 Malaysia
2010s 134,320 194,490 60,170 Sudan
2020s 136,000 144,000 8,000 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Malaysia or Sudan?
Sudan, at 144,000 against 136,000 in Malaysia as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Malaysia and Sudan?
8,000, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sudan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Malaysia and Sudan rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Malaysia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.