Mozambique vs Togo: Armed forces personnel, total

Mozambique
11,000
in 2020
Togo
10,000
in 2020
Mozambique rank
128th
Togo rank
131st

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Mozambique
  • Togo
020.0k40.0k60.0k198520022020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 11,000 against 10,000 in Togo, a difference of 1,000.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 128th and Togo ranks 131st of 173 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Togo Difference Ahead
1980s 40,400 4,800 35,600 Mozambique
1990s 28,230 7,885 20,345 Mozambique
2000s 10,250 9,475 775 Mozambique
2010s 11,160 9,465 1,695 Mozambique
2020s 11,000 10,000 1,000 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Mozambique or Togo?
Mozambique, at 11,000 against 10,000 in Togo as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Mozambique and Togo?
1,000, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Togo?
33 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Mozambique and Togo rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Mozambique ranks 128th and Togo ranks 131st of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.