Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Armed forces personnel, total

Portugal
52,000
in 2020
Zimbabwe
51,000
in 2020
Portugal rank
68th
Zimbabwe rank
69th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • Portugal
  • Zimbabwe
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k198520022020

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 52,000 against 51,000 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,000.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 173 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 88,500 46,000 42,500 Portugal
1990s 93,630 54,400 39,230 Portugal
2000s 91,114 53,600 37,514 Portugal
2010s 73,323 50,860 22,463 Portugal
2020s 52,000 51,000 1,000 Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, Portugal or Zimbabwe?
Portugal, at 52,000 against 51,000 in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between Portugal and Zimbabwe?
1,000, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
How do Portugal and Zimbabwe rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
Portugal ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.