Afghanistan vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Afghanistan
65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2021
Sweden
66.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
54th
Sweden rank
53rd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Sweden
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019922024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 66.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Afghanistan, a difference of 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sweden ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 53rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 101.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 258.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 157.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Sweden
1970s 148.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 199.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 51.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Sweden
1980s 564.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 171.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 392.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Afghanistan
1990s 1.46 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 74.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.39 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Afghanistan
2000s 81.38 million SIPRI trend indicator values 63.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 18.38 million SIPRI trend indicator values Afghanistan
2010s 332.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 72.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 259.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values Afghanistan
2020s 148.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 62.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 85.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Afghanistan or Sweden?
Sweden, at 66.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 65.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Afghanistan and Sweden?
1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2021.
How do Afghanistan and Sweden rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Afghanistan ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 53rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/afghanistan/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/afghanistan/sweden/">Afghanistan vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.