Argentina vs Rwanda: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Argentina
43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Rwanda
37.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2023
Argentina rank
69th
Rwanda rank
72nd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Argentina
  • Rwanda
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196019922024

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 37.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Rwanda, a difference of 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 172 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 25.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 4.12 million SIPRI trend indicator values 21.38 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
1970s 347.71 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.29 million SIPRI trend indicator values 346.43 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
1980s 433.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 430.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
1990s 122.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 5.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 116.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
2000s 55.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 44.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
2010s 20.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.05 million SIPRI trend indicator values 9.55 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina
2020s 38.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values 35.38 million SIPRI trend indicator values 3.38 million SIPRI trend indicator values Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Argentina or Rwanda?
Argentina, at 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 37.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Argentina and Rwanda?
6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Rwanda?
47 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Rwanda rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Argentina ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Rwanda: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/argentina/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/argentina/rwanda/">Argentina vs Rwanda: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β€” these are filled holes, not forecasts.