Central African Republic vs Malta: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Central African Republic
43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2023
Malta
45.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
69th
Malta rank
68th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 45.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Central African Republic, a difference of 2.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 69th and Malta ranks 68th of 172 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 250,000 SIPRI trend indicator values 3.12 million SIPRI trend indicator values 2.88 million SIPRI trend indicator values Malta
1980s 0 SIPRI trend indicator values 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Malta
1990s 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 13.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Malta
2010s 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Malta
2020s 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 45.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 2.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Central African Republic or Malta?
Malta, at 45.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Central African Republic and Malta?
2.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malta?
8 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Malta rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Central African Republic ranks 69th and Malta ranks 68th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Malta: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/malta/">Central African Republic vs Malta: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.