Cuba vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Cuba
8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2004
Lao People's Democratic Republic
7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Cuba rank
120th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
122nd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Cuba
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196019922024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 120th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 122nd of 172 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 339.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 9.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 329.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Cuba
1970s 363.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 34.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values 328.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values Cuba
1980s 445.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 37.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 407.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Cuba
1990s 169.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 161.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Cuba
2000s 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 2.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Cuba or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Cuba, at 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2004.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Cuba and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
32 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2004.
How do Cuba and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Cuba ranks 120th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 122nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/cuba/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/cuba/lao-pdr/">Cuba vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.