Cuba vs Malaysia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Malaysia, a difference of 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 120th and Malaysia ranks 122nd of 172 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 339.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 57.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 281.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values | Cuba |
| 1970s | 363.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 163.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 199.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values | Cuba |
| 1980s | 445.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 162.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 282.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values | Cuba |
| 1990s | 164.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 34.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 130.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | Cuba |
| 2000s | 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 69.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 61.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Cuba or Malaysia?
- Cuba, at 8.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Malaysia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Cuba and Malaysia?
- 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malaysia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Malaysia rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 120th and Malaysia ranks 122nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β these are filled holes, not forecasts.