Denmark vs Italy: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Denmark
427.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Italy
432.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Denmark rank
22nd
Italy rank
21st

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Denmark
  • Italy
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019922024

How they compare

Italy currently reports 432.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 427.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Denmark, a difference of 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Italy ahead.

Denmark ranks 22nd and Italy ranks 21st of 172 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 186.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 613.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 427.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
1970s 217.25 million SIPRI trend indicator values 920.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 703.45 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
1980s 221.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 237.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 15.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
1990s 96.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 214.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 117.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
2000s 108.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 304.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 196.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
2010s 64.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 290.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 226.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy
2020s 247.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 313.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 66.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Denmark or Italy?
Italy, at 432.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 427.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Denmark and Italy?
5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Italy?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Italy rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Denmark ranks 22nd and Italy ranks 21st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Italy: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/denmark/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/denmark/italy/">Denmark vs Italy: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β€” these are filled holes, not forecasts.