Ecuador vs Jordan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Ecuador
25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Jordan
24.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Ecuador rank
80th
Jordan rank
81st

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jordan
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B196019922024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 24.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Jordan, a difference of 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Jordan ranks 81st of 172 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 20.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 70.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 49.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
1970s 135.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 256.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 121.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
1980s 151.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 406.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 255.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
1990s 41.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 54.05 million SIPRI trend indicator values 12.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
2000s 35.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 158.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 123.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
2010s 39.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 197.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 157.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan
2020s 15.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 61.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 45.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Ecuador or Jordan?
Ecuador, at 25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 24.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Jordan as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Ecuador and Jordan?
1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Jordan ranks 81st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β€” these are filled holes, not forecasts.