Guatemala vs Libya: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Guatemala
6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2023
Libya
5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Guatemala rank
129th
Libya rank
132nd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Guatemala
  • Libya
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196019922024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Libya, a difference of 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 129th and Libya ranks 132nd of 172 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 6.65 million SIPRI trend indicator values 30.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 24.05 million SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
1970s 15.45 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.79 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 1.78 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
1980s 11.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.25 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 1.24 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
1990s 0 SIPRI trend indicator values 11.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
2000s 250,000 SIPRI trend indicator values 19.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 18.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
2010s 12.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values 42.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 29.85 million SIPRI trend indicator values Libya
2020s 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 17.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Guatemala or Libya?
Guatemala, at 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Guatemala and Libya?
1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Libya?
47 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Libya rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Guatemala ranks 129th and Libya ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Libya: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/guatemala/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/guatemala/libya/">Guatemala vs Libya: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β€” these are filled holes, not forecasts.