Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
387.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Serbia
153.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
38th
Serbia rank
37th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Serbia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196019922024

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 387.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 153.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Serbia, a difference of 234.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 2.5 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 37th of 43 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 880.33 million SIPRI trend indicator values 24.28 million SIPRI trend indicator values 856.06 million SIPRI trend indicator values Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 499.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 199.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 299.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Serbia?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 387.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 153.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia?
234.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 37th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/serbia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.