IDA blend vs Norway: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

IDA blend
1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Norway
349.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
IDA blend rank
26th
Norway rank
26th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • IDA blend
  • Norway
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019922024

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 349.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Norway, a difference of 748.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 3.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Norway ahead.

IDA blend ranks 26th and Norway ranks 26th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 6 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 296.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 342.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 46.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Norway
1970s 633.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 60.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 572.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1980s 1.11 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 328.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 785.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1990s 670.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 197.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 473.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2000s 659.85 million SIPRI trend indicator values 277.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 382.45 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2010s 1.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 252.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.01 billion SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2020s 1.51 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 441.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.06 billion SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, IDA blend or Norway?
IDA blend, at 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 349.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between IDA blend and Norway?
748.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Norway?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do IDA blend and Norway rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
IDA blend ranks 26th and Norway ranks 26th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Norway: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/norway/">IDA blend vs Norway: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.