IDA blend vs Romania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

IDA blend
1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Romania
278.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
IDA blend rank
26th
Romania rank
29th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • IDA blend
  • Romania
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019922024

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 278.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Romania, a difference of 819.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 3.9 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Romania ahead.

IDA blend ranks 26th and Romania ranks 29th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 6 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 296.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 332.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 36.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values Romania
1970s 633.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 495.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 138.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1980s 1.11 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 345.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 768.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1990s 670.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 130.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 540.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2000s 659.85 million SIPRI trend indicator values 110.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 549.45 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2010s 1.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 56.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.20 billion SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2020s 1.51 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 223.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.28 billion SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, IDA blend or Romania?
IDA blend, at 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 278.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between IDA blend and Romania?
819.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Romania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do IDA blend and Romania rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
IDA blend ranks 26th and Romania ranks 29th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Romania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/romania/">IDA blend vs Romania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.