IDA blend vs Singapore: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

IDA blend
1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Singapore
348.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
IDA blend rank
26th
Singapore rank
27th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • IDA blend
  • Singapore
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019922024

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 348.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Singapore, a difference of 749.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 3.2 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was IDA blend ahead.

IDA blend ranks 26th and Singapore ranks 27th of 43 groups.

IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 482.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 32.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 450.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1970s 633.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 189.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 443.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1980s 1.11 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 233.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 881.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
1990s 670.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 354.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 316.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2000s 659.85 million SIPRI trend indicator values 529.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 130.65 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2010s 1.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 559.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 699.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend
2020s 1.51 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 340.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, IDA blend or Singapore?
IDA blend, at 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 348.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between IDA blend and Singapore?
749.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Singapore?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do IDA blend and Singapore rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
IDA blend ranks 26th and Singapore ranks 27th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Singapore: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/ida-blend/singapore/">IDA blend vs Singapore: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.