India vs Poland: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

India
1.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Poland
1.45 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
India rank
4th
Poland rank
2nd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • India
  • Poland
02.0B4.0B6.0B196019922024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.45 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 1.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values in India, a difference of 280.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times India's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Poland ahead.

India ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 172 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.03 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 962.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 64.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values India
1970s 1.51 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 962.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 548.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values India
1980s 3.03 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 838.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 2.19 billion SIPRI trend indicator values India
1990s 1.34 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 86.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values India
2000s 1.77 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 337.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.44 billion SIPRI trend indicator values India
2010s 3.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 152.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 3.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values India
2020s 2.38 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 682.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.69 billion SIPRI trend indicator values India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, India or Poland?
Poland, at 1.45 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 1.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values in India as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between India and Poland?
280.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Poland?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do India and Poland rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
India ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Poland: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/india/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/india/poland/">India vs Poland: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement β€” these are filled holes, not forecasts.