Indonesia vs Israel: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Indonesia
186.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Israel
211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Indonesia rank
36th
Israel rank
33rd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Indonesia
  • Israel
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019922024

How they compare

Israel currently reports 211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 186.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Indonesia, a difference of 25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 36th and Israel ranks 33rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 339.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 474.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 134.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1970s 98.60 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.31 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 1.21 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1980s 389.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 768.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 379.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1990s 195.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 717.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 522.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
2000s 205.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 580.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 375.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
2010s 521.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 380.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 141.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Indonesia
2020s 262.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 546.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 284.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Indonesia or Israel?
Israel, at 211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 186.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Indonesia and Israel?
25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Israel?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Israel rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Indonesia ranks 36th and Israel ranks 33rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Israel: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/indonesia/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/indonesia/israel/">Indonesia vs Israel: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.