Israel vs Philippines: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Israel
211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Philippines
238.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Israel rank
33rd
Philippines rank
31st

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Israel
  • Philippines
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019922024

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 238.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Israel, a difference of 27.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 31st of 172 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 474.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 38.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 435.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1970s 1.31 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 113.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.20 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1980s 768.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 39.15 million SIPRI trend indicator values 729.65 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
1990s 717.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 49.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 668.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
2000s 580.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 14.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 565.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
2010s 380.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 104.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 275.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel
2020s 546.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 264.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 281.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Israel or Philippines?
Philippines, at 238.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 211.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Israel as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Israel and Philippines?
27.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Philippines?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Israel and Philippines rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Israel ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 31st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Philippines: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/israel/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/israel/philippines/">Israel vs Philippines: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.