Low income vs Senegal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

Low income
141.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Senegal
77.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Low income rank
42nd
Senegal rank
47th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • Low income
  • Senegal
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196019922024

How they compare

Low income currently reports 141.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 77.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Senegal, a difference of 64.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes Low income's figure about 1.8 times Senegal's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Low income has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 42nd and Senegal ranks 47th of 43 groups.

Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.05 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 5.85 million SIPRI trend indicator values 1.04 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Low income
1970s 3.08 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 18.25 million SIPRI trend indicator values 3.07 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Low income
1980s 3.21 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 15.75 million SIPRI trend indicator values 3.19 billion SIPRI trend indicator values Low income
2000s 633.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 622.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values Low income
2010s 972.45 million SIPRI trend indicator values 22.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values 950.35 million SIPRI trend indicator values Low income
2020s 317.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values 64.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values 253.30 million SIPRI trend indicator values Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Low income or Senegal?
Low income, at 141.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values against 77.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Senegal as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Low income and Senegal?
64.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values, with Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Senegal?
48 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Low income and Senegal rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
Low income ranks 42nd and Senegal ranks 47th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Senegal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/low-income/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/low-income/senegal/">Low income vs Senegal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.