Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Turkey: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Turkey
How they compare
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 1.39 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 381.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Turkey, a difference of 1.00 billion SIPRI trend indicator values.
That makes Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 3.6 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 21st and Turkey ranks 24th of 43 groups.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.76 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 538.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 2.22 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 1970s | 10.13 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 769.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 9.36 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 1980s | 10.35 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 795.10 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 9.56 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 1990s | 3.26 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 1.75 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 1.50 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 2000s | 2.77 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 684.70 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 2.09 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 2010s | 5.36 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 744.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 4.62 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 2020s | 3.05 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | 327.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values | 2.72 billion SIPRI trend indicator values | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Turkey?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), at 1.39 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 381.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values in Turkey as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Turkey?
- 1.00 billion SIPRI trend indicator values, with Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Turkey?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Turkey rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 21st and Turkey ranks 24th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.