OECD members vs Qatar: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled

OECD members
11.87 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
Qatar
1.15 billion SIPRI trend indicator values
in 2024
OECD members rank
6th
Qatar rank
5th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled over time

  • OECD members
  • Qatar
05.0B10.0B15.0B196019922024

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 11.87 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 1.15 billion SIPRI trend indicator values in Qatar, a difference of 10.72 billion SIPRI trend indicator values.

That makes OECD members's figure about 10.3 times Qatar's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 6th and Qatar ranks 5th of 43 groups.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 11.73 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 2.50 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.73 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
1970s 12.00 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 25.20 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.98 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
1980s 12.64 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 117.40 million SIPRI trend indicator values 12.53 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
1990s 12.04 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 91.90 million SIPRI trend indicator values 11.95 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
2000s 10.61 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 118.12 million SIPRI trend indicator values 10.49 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
2010s 7.62 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 499.80 million SIPRI trend indicator values 7.12 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members
2020s 9.96 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 1.96 billion SIPRI trend indicator values 8.01 billion SIPRI trend indicator values OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled, OECD members or Qatar?
OECD members, at 11.87 billion SIPRI trend indicator values against 1.15 billion SIPRI trend indicator values in Qatar as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled between OECD members and Qatar?
10.72 billion SIPRI trend indicator values, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Qatar?
51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2024.
How do OECD members and Qatar rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), gaps filled?
OECD members ranks 6th and Qatar ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Qatar: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/oecd-members/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-gaps-filled/oecd-members/qatar/">OECD members vs Qatar: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,599 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) with 1,179 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.