Bahamas vs Early-demographic dividend: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita

Bahamas
30.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2017
Early-demographic dividend
1.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Bahamas rank
26th
Early-demographic dividend rank
23rd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita over time

  • Bahamas
  • Early-demographic dividend
050100150196019922024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 30.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 1.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 29.05 SIPRI trend indicator values per person.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 18.3 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 26th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd of 172 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Early-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 49.16 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 12.87 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 36.29 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Bahamas
1980s 128.14 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 8.5 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 119.64 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Bahamas
1990s 8.97 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 5.27 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Bahamas
2000s 37.79 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.54 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 35.25 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Bahamas
2010s 50.57 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 4.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 46.2 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita, Bahamas or Early-demographic dividend?
Bahamas, at 30.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 1.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2017.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita between Bahamas and Early-demographic dividend?
29.05 SIPRI trend indicator values per person, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Early-demographic dividend?
11 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2017.
How do Bahamas and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita?
Bahamas ranks 26th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Early-demographic dividend: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/bahamas-the/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/bahamas-the/early-demographic-dividend/">Bahamas vs Early-demographic dividend: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,420 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.