China vs Sudan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita

China
0.0511 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0396 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
China rank
160th
Sudan rank
163rd

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita over time

  • China
  • Sudan
0204060196019922024

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0511 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 0.0396 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0115 SIPRI trend indicator values per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1960 it was China ahead.

China ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 163rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.805 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.89 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
1970s 0.0242 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 10.13 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 10.1 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
1980s 0.0539 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 3.76 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
1990s 0.8008 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 1.06 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 0.2636 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
2000s 1.9 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 4 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.1 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
2010s 0.9467 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.76 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 1.81 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sudan
2020s 0.2714 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 0.0734 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 0.1979 SIPRI trend indicator values per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita, China or Sudan?
China, at 0.0511 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 0.0396 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita between China and Sudan?
0.0115 SIPRI trend indicator values per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sudan?
57 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do China and Sudan rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita?
China ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 163rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sudan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/china/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/china/sudan/">China vs Sudan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,420 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.