Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Sweden
6.24 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
55th
Sweden rank
56th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sweden
0204060196019922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 6.24 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Sweden, a difference of 0.1 SIPRI trend indicator values per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Sweden ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 56th of 172 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 18.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 27.67 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 9.59 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sweden
1980s 9.49 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 23.81 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 14.32 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sweden
1990s 4.5 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 25.29 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 20.79 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sweden
2000s 21.48 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 8.37 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 13.11 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 34.21 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 10.31 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 23.9 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.17 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 8.98 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 5.81 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
Equatorial Guinea, at 6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 6.24 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
0.1 SIPRI trend indicator values per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
18 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 56th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sweden/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,420 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.