Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Tunisia
6.35 SIPRI trend indicator values per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
55th
Tunisia rank
54th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tunisia
0204060196019922024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 6.35 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.01 SIPRI trend indicator values per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th and Tunisia ranks 54th of 172 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 18.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.22 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 15.86 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 9.49 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 12.14 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 2.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Tunisia
1990s 4.5 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 1.24 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 3.25 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 15.45 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 5.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 9.83 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 25.44 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 4.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 20.52 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.17 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 3.97 SIPRI trend indicator values per person 0.7947 SIPRI trend indicator values per person Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 6.35 SIPRI trend indicator values per person against 6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
0.01 SIPRI trend indicator values per person, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 55th and Tunisia ranks 54th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,420 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.