Australia vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Australia
49.27 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
106th
Kazakhstan rank
107th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 49.27 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.97 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 106th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 170 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 44.71 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 21.95 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 22.77 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Australia
2000s 81.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 23.67 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 58.07 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Australia
2010s 153.95 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 68.93 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 85.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Australia
2020s 131.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 72.14 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 59.2 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 49.27 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Australia and Kazakhstan?
2.97 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 106th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.