Central African Republic vs Cuba: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
69.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2004
Central African Republic rank
99th
Cuba rank
97th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Cuba
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 69.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 6.16 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 97th of 170 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 3.21 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 2,435 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 2,432 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 1.07 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 3,367 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 3,366 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 4.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 5,321 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 5,316 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Cuba?
Cuba, at 75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 69.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2004.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Cuba?
6.16 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cuba?
14 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1988.
How do Central African Republic and Cuba rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 99th and Cuba ranks 97th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Cuba: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/cuba/">Central African Republic vs Cuba: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.