Chad vs Guyana: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Chad
25.41 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
23.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
125th
Guyana rank
128th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Guyana
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 25.41 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 23.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 1.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Guyana ahead.

Chad ranks 125th and Guyana ranks 128th of 170 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Guyana Difference Ahead
1970s 6.03 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 25.4 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 19.37 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 11.32 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 46.99 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 35.67 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 39.31 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 17.78 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 21.53 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Chad
2010s 3.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 5.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1.9 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 29.78 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 23.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 6.1 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Chad or Guyana?
Chad, at 25.41 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 23.68 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Chad and Guyana?
1.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guyana?
15 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Chad and Guyana rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 125th and Guyana ranks 128th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Guyana: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/chad/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/chad/guyana/">Chad vs Guyana: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.