Croatia vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Croatia
1,590 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
29th
New Zealand rank
30th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • New Zealand
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1,590 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 52 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 503.57 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 271.54 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 232.03 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 556.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 294.6 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 262.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 234.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 172.53 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 62.32 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 1,054 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,094 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 39.44 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Croatia or New Zealand?
Croatia, at 1,590 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 1,538 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Croatia and New Zealand?
52 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 30th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/croatia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/croatia/new-zealand/">Croatia vs New Zealand: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.