Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Cuba
75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2004
Sri Lanka
80.83 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
97th
Sri Lanka rank
94th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Sri Lanka
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 80.83 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 5.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 97th and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 170 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 1,895 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 15.95 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,879 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 3,479 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 279.06 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 3,200 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 2,320 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 619.63 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,700 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 1,527 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,491 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 36.01 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 765.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 690.25 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 80.83 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 75.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
5.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
18 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2004.
How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 97th and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/">Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.