Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Guatemala
55.99 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
104th
Kazakhstan rank
107th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kazakhstan
0100200300400500196219922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 55.99 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 9.69 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 104th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 28 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 18.71 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 9.29 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 10.37 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 10.37 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 123.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 96.77 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 26.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 74.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 58.52 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 16.13 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Kazakhstan?
Guatemala, at 55.99 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
9.69 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
9 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kazakhstan rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 104th and Kazakhstan ranks 107th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/">Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.