IBRD only vs Lithuania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

IBRD only
184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania
1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
22nd
Lithuania rank
27th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Lithuania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196219922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 1,588 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 9.6 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

IBRD only ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 27th of 43 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 117.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 329.72 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 211.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 139.58 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 328.66 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 189.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 185.64 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 340.51 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 154.87 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 149.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,653 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,503 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, IBRD only or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between IBRD only and Lithuania?
1,588 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Lithuania?
29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Lithuania rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 27th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Lithuania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/lithuania/">IBRD only vs Lithuania: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.