Latvia vs Portugal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre

Latvia
674.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
731.4 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
48th
Portugal rank
47th

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Portugal
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 731.4 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 674.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 56.48 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.

Latvia ranks 48th and Portugal ranks 47th of 170 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 80.35 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,191 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,111 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 316.05 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,305 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 989.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 281.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,321 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 1,040 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 358.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 429.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre 70.49 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre, Latvia or Portugal?
Portugal, at 731.4 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre against 674.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre between Latvia and Portugal?
56.48 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Portugal?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Portugal rank globally for arms imports (sipri trend indicator values), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 48th and Portugal ranks 47th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Portugal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/latvia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/arms-imports-sipri-trend-indicator-values-per-square-kilometre/latvia/portugal/">Latvia vs Portugal: Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre
Unit
SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 8,996 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.